From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Carroll

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Apr 30, 2007
Case No: 5:03cr42/MCR, 5:06cv238/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 30, 2007)

Opinion

Case No: 5:03cr42/MCR, 5:06cv238/MCR/MD.

April 30, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated April 5, 2007. The defendant previously has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and any objections thereto timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 75) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Carroll

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Apr 30, 2007
Case No: 5:03cr42/MCR, 5:06cv238/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 30, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Carroll

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLARD TIMOTHY CARROLL

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Apr 30, 2007

Citations

Case No: 5:03cr42/MCR, 5:06cv238/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Apr. 30, 2007)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Rademacher

But c.f. United States v. Girosky-Garibay, 176 F. Supp. 2d 705, 710 (W.D.Tex. 2001) (holding that a court's…

U.S. v. Keyes

Accordingly, I conclude Lopez announced a substantive new rule of law that should be applied retroactively to…