finding district court did not abuse its discretion when it permitted defendants to respond to requests for admissions eight days after they were due and the opposing party failed to show any material prejudice from the delay
Summary of this case from Lonewolf v. GarrettNo. 89-2625.
November 29, 1989.
Decisions Without Published Opinions.
AFFIRMED.
finding district court did not abuse its discretion when it permitted defendants to respond to requests for admissions eight days after they were due and the opposing party failed to show any material prejudice from the delay
Summary of this case from Lonewolf v. Garrettconcluding that the Youth Corrections Act did not authorize expunction of the records of a conviction that had been set aside pursuant to § 5021
Summary of this case from U.S. v. DoeFull title:U.S. v. Carilion Health System
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Nov 29, 1989
We decline the invitation, and conclude that as the parties have framed the issues the merger is not subject…
F.T.C. v. University Health, Inc.Thus, section 11 of the Clayton Act evidences Congress' intent to exempt from the FTC's enforcement of…