From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Brown

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 9, 2006
Crim. No. 06-148(01) (JMR/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 9, 2006)

Summary

finding that the question did not invoke the right to counsel based on the suspect's answers to the clarifying questions asked by the detectives

Summary of this case from Washington v. State

Opinion

Crim. No. 06-148(01) (JMR/RLE).

August 9, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter, IT IS ORDERED:

1. That the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence of Search [Docket No. 16] is denied.

2. That the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements [Docket No. 17] is granted, in part, and denied, in part, as further detailed in the text of the Report and Recommendation dated July 11, 2006.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Brown

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 9, 2006
Crim. No. 06-148(01) (JMR/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 9, 2006)

finding that the question did not invoke the right to counsel based on the suspect's answers to the clarifying questions asked by the detectives

Summary of this case from Washington v. State
Case details for

U.S. v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Derrick Lamont Brown, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 9, 2006

Citations

Crim. No. 06-148(01) (JMR/RLE) (D. Minn. Aug. 9, 2006)

Citing Cases

Washington v. State

" does not invoke the right to counsel but is merely a prefatory question about the suspect's rights. SeeFord…

United States v. Davis

SeeUnited States v. Ray , 690 F. App'x 366, 372 (6th Cir. 2017) (holding that asking "whose guns are these?"…