From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Borough of Audubon

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 22, 1992
968 F.2d 14 (3d Cir. 1992)

Summary

finding that there was intentional discrimination where the "officials stated that they agreed with or were responding directly to community opposition which was clearly discriminatory"

Summary of this case from Sunlight of the Spirit House, Inc. v. Borough of N. Wales

Opinion

No. 91-5821.

May 22, 1992.

D.N.J., Gerry, J.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

U.S. v. Borough of Audubon

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 22, 1992
968 F.2d 14 (3d Cir. 1992)

finding that there was intentional discrimination where the "officials stated that they agreed with or were responding directly to community opposition which was clearly discriminatory"

Summary of this case from Sunlight of the Spirit House, Inc. v. Borough of N. Wales

finding that the discriminatory intent of government officials may be established where animus towards a protected group is a significant factor in the community opposition to which the commissioners are responding

Summary of this case from Pathways Psychosocial v. Town of Leonardtown

awarding $10,000 civil penalty against municipal defendant

Summary of this case from Hispanics United of Dupage County v. Village of Addison
Case details for

U.S. v. Borough of Audubon

Case Details

Full title:U.S. v. Borough of Audubon, N.J

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: May 22, 1992

Citations

968 F.2d 14 (3d Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

North Shore-Chicago Rehabilitation Inc. v. Village of Skokie

As Magistrate Judge Bucklo aptly observed, in order to demonstrate a likelihood of success, North Shore must…

Hispanics United of Dupage County v. Village of Addison

453 US. at 267 n. 29, 101 S.Ct. at 2760 n. 29. Plaintiffs argue that such a situation is not so unlikely in…