From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Armstrong

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
May 20, 2005
Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-1852-H (N.D. Tex. May. 20, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-1852-H.

May 20, 2005


ORDER


Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed April 21, 2005, and the Objections thereto, filed May 19, 2005, by Defendant Connie Armstrong.

The Court has made the required independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case; the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge; and Defendant's Objections. Having done so, the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are ADOPTED as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court, and Defendant's Objections are OVERRULED.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Armstrong

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
May 20, 2005
Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-1852-H (N.D. Tex. May. 20, 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff v. CONNIE C. ARMSTRONG Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: May 20, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-1852-H (N.D. Tex. May. 20, 2005)

Citing Cases

United States v. Scharton

The CCPA garnishment limitations do not extend to wages deposited in financial institutions. Usery v First…