U.S. v. Alvarado

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard ALVARADO…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 21, 1994

38 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 1994)

Opinion

38 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50748. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit October 21, 1994

Submitted October 17, 1994. ^*

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4.

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-89-0332-SVW-03; Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding.

C.D.Cal.

AFFIRMED.

Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3.

Richard Alvarado appeals his 121-sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to distributing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alvarado's counsel filed a brief that presents no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review. Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.