From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Alexander

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 6, 2010
390 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6557.

Submitted: July 27, 2010.

Decided: August 6, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:95-cr-00013-BO-1).

Clarence Edward Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Clarence Edward Alexander appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider the court's earlier order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 234-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that district court lacked authority to grant defendant's motion to reconsider, filed eight months after the district court's order ruling on original § 3582(c)(2) motion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Alexander

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 6, 2010
390 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence Edward…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 6, 2010

Citations

390 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2010)