From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Crowd Mach.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 4, 2024
4:22-cv-00076-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2024)

Opinion

4:22-cv-00076-HSG

01-04-2024

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CROWD MACHINE, INC., METAVINE, INC, and CRAIG DEREL SPROULE, Defendants, and METAVINE PTY. LTD., Relief Defendant,


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

HON HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR, JUDGE.

ORDER

The Court, having considered Defendant's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, and the Declaration of Anne Osborne in support thereof, HEREBY ORDERS THAT:

1. The Court finds there are compelling reasons sufficient to overcome the presumption in favor of granting public access to the documents below. “Courts have found that ‘confidential business information' in the form of ‘financial terms and business strategies' satisfies the ‘compelling reasons' standard.” Baird v. BlackRock Inst. Trust. Co., N.A., 403 F.Supp.3d 765, 792 (N.D. Cal. 2019) (Gilliam, J.) (quoting In re Qualcomm Litig., 2017 WL 5176922, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2017)) (emphasis added). Courts find compelling reasons to seal records where filings may “become a vehicle for improper purposes, such as the use of records to . . . release trade secrets.” In re Elec. Arts, Inc., 298 Fed.Appx. 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008) (internal quotation and citation omitted).

2. Further, courts in the Ninth Circuit routinely find compelling reasons to seal personally-identifying information, finding that risks associated with disclosing such information may outweigh the public's interest to access. See, e.g., Cancino Castellar v. Mayorkas, 2021 WL 3678440, at*3-4 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2021) (collecting cases).

3. Finally, “Courts generally accept attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine as a ‘compelling reason' justifying a motion to seal.” WatchGuard Techs., Inc. v. iValue Infosolutions Pvt. Ltd., 2017 WL 3581624, at *2 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 18, 2017) (collecting cases).

4. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Administrative Motion is GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to accept the under-seal filing of the following materials:

Docket No. Public / (Sealed)

Document

Portion(s) to Seal

Evidence Offered in Support of Sealing

Ruling

52-1 (50-1)

Declaration of Anne Osborne in support of Defendants' opposition to Plaintiff's motion for monetary relief

with redactions

Osborne Decl. ¶¶ 4-6, 8(j) confidential financial and commercially-sensitive information; personally-identifying information

Granted

52-3 (50-2)

Exhibit A: Expert report of Christian Tregillis

with redactions

Osborne Decl. ¶¶ 4-6, 8(a) confidential financial and commercially-sensitive information

Granted

52-4 (50-3)

Exhibit B: Documents relied upon in expert report of Christian Tregillis

entire document under seal

Osborne Decl. ¶¶ 4-6, 8(b) confidential financial and commercially-sensitive information; proprietary product information

Granted

52-5 (51)

Exhibit C: Supplemental expert report of Christian Tregillis

with redactions

Osborne Decl. ¶¶ 4-6, 8(c) confidential financial and commercially-sensitive

Granted

52-6 (51-1)

Exhibit D: Metavine Genesis release notes

entire document under seal

Osborne Decl. ¶¶ 4-6, 8(d) confidential financial and commercially-sensitive information; proprietary product information

Granted

52-7 (51-2)

Exhibit E: Defendants' written responses to SEC

with redactions

Osborne Decl. ¶¶ 4-7, 8(e) confidential financial and commercially-sensitive information; personally-identifying information

Granted

52-8 (51-3)

Exhibit F: Document produced to SEC

with redactions

Osborne Decl. ¶¶ 4-7, 8(f) confidential financial and commercially-sensitive information; personally-identifying information; proprietary product information

Granted

52-9 (51-4)

Exhibit G: Letter from public accounting and consulting firm re ISRS 4400

entire document under seal

Osborne Decl. ¶¶ 4-6, 8(g) confidential financial and commercially-sensitive information

Granted

52-12 (51-5)

Exhibit J: Production cover letters produced to SEC

with redactions

Osborne Decl. ¶¶ 4-7, 8(h) confidential financial and commercially-sensitive information; personally-identifying information

Granted

52-13 (51-6)

Exhibit K: Defendants' current financial information

entire document under seal

Osborne Decl. ¶¶ 4-7, 8(i) confidential financial and commercially-sensitive information

Granted

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Crowd Mach.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 4, 2024
4:22-cv-00076-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2024)
Case details for

U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Crowd Mach.

Case Details

Full title:U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CROWD MACHINE…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 4, 2024

Citations

4:22-cv-00076-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2024)