From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. for the Use of Malloy v. Bowden

U.S.
May 13, 1957
353 U.S. 957 (1957)

Summary

finding of insufficient notice because supplier gave no notice to the general contractor, but instead relied on notice provided by another subcontractor for whom the supplier had provided equipment

Summary of this case from Okee Industries, Inc. v. National Grange Mutual Insurance

Opinion

No. 867.

May 13, 1957.


C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. John E. McCall for petitioner. Reported below: 239 F. 2d 572.


Summaries of

U.S. for the Use of Malloy v. Bowden

U.S.
May 13, 1957
353 U.S. 957 (1957)

finding of insufficient notice because supplier gave no notice to the general contractor, but instead relied on notice provided by another subcontractor for whom the supplier had provided equipment

Summary of this case from Okee Industries, Inc. v. National Grange Mutual Insurance
Case details for

U.S. for the Use of Malloy v. Bowden

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES FOR THE USE OF MALLOY v. BOWDEN, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 13, 1957

Citations

353 U.S. 957 (1957)

Citing Cases

United States, Etc. v. J. F. White Contracting

The purpose of the notice requirement is to establish a time after which the principal contractor can pay its…

U.S. v. Sun Eng. Ent., Inc.

Id. This result arguably runs counter to equitable considerations but, according to the court, the protection…