From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Bank v. Galang

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Sep 30, 2020
NO. CAAP-20-0000176 (Haw. Ct. App. Sep. 30, 2020)

Opinion

NO. CAAP-20-0000176

09-30-2020

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-11, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARTHUR EMIL GALANG; NORIVIC V. GALANG; NORMA PASCUAL RODIL; Defendants- Appellants, and LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR LEHMAN BROTHERS-STRUCTURED ASSET INVESTMENT LOAN TRUST SALE 2004-11; JOHN DOES 1-50; JANE DOES 1-50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-50, DOE CORPORATIONS 1-50; DOE ENTITIES 1-50, AND DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-50, Defendants-Appellees


NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
(CIVIL NO. 1CC151001045) ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
(By: Chan, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) On March 20, 2020, self-represented Defendants-Appellants Arthur Emil Galang, Norivic V. Galang, and Norma Pascual Rodil filed the notice of appeal electronically through Arthur Emil Galang, a registered Judiciary Electronic Filing System (JEFS) User. But Norivic V. Galang and Norma Pascual Rodil are not registered JEFS Users and the notice of appeal does not contain their handwritten signatures, consistent with Hawai'i Electronic Filing & Service Rules Rule 5.3. Thus, the notice of appeal is invalid as to Norivic V. Galang and Norma Pascual Rodil;

(2) The opening brief was due on a clerk's extension on or before July 15, 2020;

(3) Arthur Emil Galang failed to file the opening brief or request a second extension of time;

(4) On July 22, 2020, the appellate clerk notified Arthur Emil Galang that the time for filing the opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on August 3, 2020, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 30, and Arthur Emil Galang could request relief from default by motion; and

(5) Arthur Emil Galang took no further action in this appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

Even if the notice of appeal was valid as to Norivic V. Galang and Norma Pascual Rodil, we note they also failed to file the opening brief, the appellate clerk notified them about the default on July 22, 2020, and they also failed to take any further action in the appeal. Thus, dismissal of their appeal, if valid, would also be warranted for failure to file the opening brief.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 30, 2020.

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Presiding Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge


Summaries of

U.S. Bank v. Galang

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Sep 30, 2020
NO. CAAP-20-0000176 (Haw. Ct. App. Sep. 30, 2020)
Case details for

U.S. Bank v. Galang

Case Details

Full title:U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK…

Court:INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Sep 30, 2020

Citations

NO. CAAP-20-0000176 (Haw. Ct. App. Sep. 30, 2020)