From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

US Bank v. Dineen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
May 27, 2020
183 A.D.3d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2018–11472 Index No. 39895/09

05-27-2020

US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Respondent, v. Margaret G. DINEEN, etc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Charles Wallshein, Melville, NY, for appellant. RAS Boriskin, LLC, Westbury, N.Y. (Joseph F. Battista and Leah Lenz of counsel), for respondent.


Charles Wallshein, Melville, NY, for appellant.

RAS Boriskin, LLC, Westbury, N.Y. (Joseph F. Battista and Leah Lenz of counsel), for respondent.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Margaret G. Dineen and for an order of reference are denied.

For reasons stated in Nationstar HECM Acquisition Trust 2015–2, Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. Andrews, 167 A.D.3d 1025, 91 N.Y.S.3d 435, we reverse the order insofar as appealed from and deny those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Margaret G. Dineen and for an order of reference.

CHAMBERS, J.P., LEVENTHAL, DUFFY and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

US Bank v. Dineen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
May 27, 2020
183 A.D.3d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

US Bank v. Dineen

Case Details

Full title:US Bank National Association, etc., respondent, v. Margaret G. Dineen…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: May 27, 2020

Citations

183 A.D.3d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 3043
122 N.Y.S.3d 903