From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uranga v. Adams

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 25, 2011
3:10-cv-00014-RCJ-RAM (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2011)

Opinion

3:10-cv-00014-RCJ-RAM.

February 25, 2011


ORDER


This case arises out of a sanctions order entered against Plaintiff in state court. Plaintiff sued the judge who issued the order, as well as former Governor Jim Gibbons, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Nevada Equal Rights Commission, and several other individuals and institutions. The Court previously granted five motions to dismiss and a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The remaining Defendants have filed motions to clarify that the case is dismissed as against them, as well. The Court grants these motions. No claim is stated against any Defendant, and amendment would be futile.

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions to Clarify (ECF Nos. 70, 74) are GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions are DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 25th day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

Uranga v. Adams

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 25, 2011
3:10-cv-00014-RCJ-RAM (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Uranga v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO URANGA, Plaintiff, v. BRENT T. ADAMS et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Feb 25, 2011

Citations

3:10-cv-00014-RCJ-RAM (D. Nev. Feb. 25, 2011)

Citing Cases

McKnight v. Nev. Dep't of Admin.

The “chief executive officer” of both the Nevada Department of Administration and the Nevada State Department…