From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uptown Realty Unlimited v. Obregon

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 21, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50707 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Opinion

570816/03.

Decided June 21, 2004.

Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, entered on or about July 30, 2003 (Peter M. Wendt, J.) which denied his motion to vacate a consent final judgment and warrant of eviction in a summary holdover proceeding based upon chronic nonpayment of rent.

Order entered on or about July 30, 2003 (Peter M. Wendt, J.) affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Peter W. Wendt, J. at the Civil Court.

PRESENT: HON. LUCINDO SUAREZ, P.J., HON. WILLIAM P. McCOOE, HON. WILLIAM J. DAVIS, Justices.


We agree that strict enforcement of the "so ordered" stipulations settling the underlying chronic rent delinquency holdover proceeding is warranted, in view of the tenant's successive payment defaults during the probationary period agreed to by the parties through counsel ( see Mill Rock Plaza Assocs. v. Lively, 224 AD2d 301).

This constitutes the decision and order of the court.


Summaries of

Uptown Realty Unlimited v. Obregon

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 21, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50707 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Case details for

Uptown Realty Unlimited v. Obregon

Case Details

Full title:UPTOWN REALTY UNLIMITED, L.L.C., Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent, v. DAVID…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 21, 2004

Citations

2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50707 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Citing Cases

New York City Hous. Auth. v. Evans

Even if Civil Court had the power to afford the tenant a post judgment stay, it would have been inappropriate…

4220 Broadway LLC v. Gomez

DISCUSSION The majority of appellate cases on point hold that a breach under a stipulation of settlement in a…