From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uppercu v. Stevens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1914
160 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

January, 1914.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.


As the plaintiff presented to the court below no complaint showing that a cause of action existed which would entitle the plaintiff to an injunction, the court was without authority, under section 603 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to grant a temporary injunction. The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for an injunction denied, with ten dollars costs.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Uppercu v. Stevens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1914
160 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Uppercu v. Stevens

Case Details

Full title:INGLIS M. UPPERCU, Respondent, v . HARRY M. STEVENS and F. AND D. COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1914

Citations

160 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Citing Cases

Matter of Julius Restaurant, Inc., v. Lombardi

( Huntington v. Cortland Home Tel. Co., 62 App. Div. 517.) The law is well settled that in order to secure an…