From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

UNIVERSAL OVEN CO. v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1980
79 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

December 15, 1980


In an action to recover damages for the alleged improper service of a restraining notice and execution with notice to garnishee, defendants separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 24, 1979, which denied (1) the motion by defendant Grogan, Heggen Steenburg (Grogan) to dismiss the complaint of the plaintiff and the cross complaint of codefendant Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (Chase), and (2) the cross motion of said codefendant to dismiss the complaint. Order reversed, on the law, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable jointly to defendants, and motion and cross motion granted. The record indicates that plaintiff was indebted to Jack Maggiore, judgment debtor of defendant Chase. Accordingly, Chase's attorney, Grogan, acted properly in levying upon this debt (see CPLR 5232, subd [a]). The fact that plaintiff may have avoided paying this debt because of insurance coverage does not change its status as a debt owed by plaintiff to the judgment debtor Maggiore. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Gulotta and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

UNIVERSAL OVEN CO. v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1980
79 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

UNIVERSAL OVEN CO. v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK

Case Details

Full title:UNIVERSAL OVEN CO., Respondent, v. CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1980

Citations

79 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Kitson Kitson v. Yonkers

Executions are delivered to the sheriff and are given priority in the order in which they are delivered to…

Amsterdam Savings Bank v. Reinhart

However, neither the loan agreement nor the promissory note contains any provision requiring plaintiff to sue…