Opinion
Civil Action No.: 2:08-cv-01307
01-17-2012
Judge Arthur J. Schwab
FILED ELECTRONICALLY
FINAL VERDICT FORM
Based on the evidence admitted at trial and in accordance with the instructions as given by the Court, we, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions: CLAIM 20
1. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian's arguments that Claim 20 of the '554 patent is invalid are unreasonable?
Yes _ No _
If the answer to question 1 is "yes," answer question 2. If your answer to question 1 is "no," skip question 2 and go to question 3.
2. For each of the following time periods, please state whether the University of Pittsburgh has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian knew, or it was so obvious that Varian should have known, that it was highly likely it was infringing a valid patent:
a. From June 2002 through April 13, 2007 (the day Pitt sued Varian for infringing the '554 patent)Yes _ No _b. From April 13, 2007 (the day Pitt sued Varian for infringing the '554 patent) through March 31, 2010 (the day the US Patent Office issued its Notice of Intent to Issue Reexamination Certificate)
Yes _ No _c. From March 31, 2010 (the day the US Patent Office issued its Notice of Intent to Issue Reexamination Certificate) to the present.
Yes _ No _
CLAIM 21
3. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian's arguments that Claim 21 of the '554 patent is invalid are unreasonable?
Yes _ No _
If the answer to question 3 is "yes," answer question 4. If your answer to question 3 is "no," skip question 4 and go to question 5.
4. For each of the following time periods, please state whether the University of Pittsburgh has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian knew, or it was so obvious that Varian should have known, that it was highly likely it was infringing a valid patent:
a. From June 2002 through April 13, 2007 (the day Pitt sued Varian for infringing the '554 patent)Yes _ No _b. From April 13, 2007 (the day Pitt sued Varian for infringing the '554 patent) through March 31, 2010 (the day the US Patent Office issued its Notice of Intent to Issue Reexamination Certificate)
Yes _ No _c. From March 31, 2010 (the day the US Patent Office issued its Notice of Intent to Issue Reexamination Certificate) to the present.
Yes _ No _
CLAIM 22
5. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian's arguments that Claim 22 of the '554 patent is invalid are unreasonable?
Yes _ No _
If the answer to question 5 is "yes," answer question 6. If your answer to question 5 is "no," skip question 6 and go to question 7.
6. For each of the following time periods, please state whether the University of Pittsburgh has proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian knew, or it was so obvious that Varian should have known, that it was highly likely it was infringing a valid patent:
a. From June 2002 through April 13, 2007 (the day Pitt sued Varian for infringing the '554 patent)Yes _ No _b. From April 13, 2007 (the day Pitt sued Varian for infringing the '554 patent) through March 31, 2010 (the day the US Patent Office issued its Notice of Intent to Issue Reexamination Certificate)
Yes _ No _c. From March 31, 2010 (the day the US Patent Office issued its Notice of Intent to Issue Reexamination Certificate) to the present.
Yes _ No _
CLAIM 25
7. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian's arguments that Claim 25 of the '554 patent is invalid are unreasonable?
Yes _ No _
If the answer to question 7 is "yes," answer question 8. If your answer to question 7 is "no," skip question 8 and go to question 9.
8. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian knew, or it was so obvious that Varian should have known, that it was highly likely it was infringing a valid patent?
Yes _ No _
CLAIM 26
9. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian's arguments that Claim 26 of the '554 patent is invalid are unreasonable?
Yes _ No _
If the answer to question 9 is "yes," answer question 10. If your answer to question 9 is "no," skip question 10 and go to question 11.
10. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian knew, or it was so obvious that Varian should have known, that it was highly likely it was infringing a valid patent?
Yes _ No _
CLAIM 36
11. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian's arguments that Claim 36 of the '554 patent is invalid are unreasonable?
Yes _ No _
If the answer to question 11 is "yes," answer question 12. If your answer to question 11 is "no," skip question 12 and go to question 13.
12. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian knew, or it was so obvious that Varian should have known, that it was highly likely it was infringing a valid patent?
Yes _ No _
CLAIM 38
13. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian's arguments that Claim 38 of the '554 patent is invalid are unreasonable?
Yes _ No _
If the answer to question 13 is "yes," answer question 14. If your answer to question 13 is "no," skip question 14 and complete the form.
14. Has the University of Pittsburgh proven by clear and convincing evidence that Varian knew, or it was so obvious that Varian should have known, that it was highly likely it was infringing a valid patent?
Yes _ No _
You have now reached the end of the verdict form and should review it to ensure it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. All jurors should then sign and date the verdict form in the spaces below and notify the bailiff that you have reached a verdict. The Foreperson should retain possession of the verdict form and bring it when the jury is brought back into the courtroom.
X_____________________Foreperson X_____________________
X_____________________ X_____________________
X_____________________ X_____________________
X_____________________ X_____________________