Opinion
2002-00037.
Decided December 15, 2003.
In an action for a judgment declaring that the site plan application of United Water New Rochelle, Inc., dated March 7, 1994, was deemed approved by operation of the Zoning Law of the Town of Eastchester, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), entered November 21, 2001, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
Sive, Paget Reisel, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Mark A. Chertok and Elizabeth Read of counsel), and Keane Beane, P.C., White Plains, N.Y. (Judson K. Siebert of counsel), for appellants (one brief filed).
Carter, Ledyard Milburn, New York, N.Y. (Stephen L. Kass, Jean M. McCarroll, and Mark D. Sullivan of counsel), for respondent.
Before: STEPHEN G. CRANE, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of a final order and judgment in the action dated December 2, 2002 ( see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order entered November 21, 2001, are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order and judgment ( see CPLR 5501[a][1]; United Water New Rochelle v. Planning Board of Town of Eastchester, 2 A.D.3d 627 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2003-00425, decided herewith]).
McGINITY, J.P., H. MILLER, CRANE and COZIER, JJ., concur.