From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wyatt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
May 12, 2015
Criminal Action No. 13-00369-01-CR-W-BP (W.D. Mo. May. 12, 2015)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 13-00369-01-CR-W-BP

05-12-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WESLEY B. WYATT, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On January 8, 2015, counsel for defendant Wesley Wyatt filed a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241 for a determination of the mental competency of the defendant to stand trial. That motion was granted and, prior to holding a hearing to determine the mental competency of the defendant, the Court entered its Order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(b) directing that a psychological or psychiatric examination of the defendant be conducted and that a psychological or psychiatric report be filed with the Court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 4247(b) and (c).

The Court has received the psychological or psychiatric report of Dr. Lisa Feldman which concluded that the defendant is competent to understand the nature and consequence of the proceedings against him and to assist properly in his defense. This report has been provided to and reviewed by counsel for the government and counsel for the defendant. On May 11, 2015, a hearing was held pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4247(d) for the purpose of determining the mental competency of the defendant to stand trial. At this hearing, counsel for the government and counsel for the defendant stipulated that the Court could consider the psychological or psychiatric report of Dr. Feldman as if Dr. Feldman had appeared in person and testified under oath. No additional evidence was offered by the government or by the defendant.

Based on the record before the Court and the findings of Dr. Feldman , it is

RECOMMENDED that the District Court, after conducting its own independent review of the record, find that defendant Wesley Wyatt is competent to understand the nature and consequence of the proceedings against him and to assist properly in his defense.

Counsel are reminded that each has 14 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Report and Recommendation to file and serve specific objections to the same. A failure to file and serve timely objections shall bar attack on appeal of the factual findings in this Report which are accepted or adopted by the District Judge except upon the ground of plain error or manifest injustice.

/s/ JOHN T. MAUGHMER

JOHN T. MAUGHMER

United States Magistrate Judge
Kansas City, Missouri


Summaries of

United States v. Wyatt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
May 12, 2015
Criminal Action No. 13-00369-01-CR-W-BP (W.D. Mo. May. 12, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Wyatt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WESLEY B. WYATT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 12, 2015

Citations

Criminal Action No. 13-00369-01-CR-W-BP (W.D. Mo. May. 12, 2015)

Citing Cases

Wyatt v. United States

And he has attempted other vehicles for his challenges in his criminal case, such as a motion to reduce…