From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Woodley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 26, 1984
732 F.2d 111 (9th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

No. 82-1028.

April 26, 1984.

Elliot Enoki, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellee.

Pamela J. Berman, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant-appellant.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn, 726 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1983).


Summaries of

United States v. Woodley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 26, 1984
732 F.2d 111 (9th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

United States v. Woodley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JANET WOODLEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 26, 1984

Citations

732 F.2d 111 (9th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

United States v. Woodley

The panel held that he could not and it vacated Woodley's conviction. United States v. Woodley, 726 F.2d…