From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Woodfolk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Jun 29, 2016
Criminal No. JFM-93-0419 (D. Md. Jun. 29, 2016)

Opinion

Criminal No. JFM-93-0419

06-29-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. COREY LORENZO WOODFOLK


MEMORANDUM

Corey Woodfolk has filed a motion for reduced sentence. He requests a sentence at the low end of the amended Guideline range, 324 months. The Government agrees that Woodfolk is entitled to a reduction of his sentence hut proposes that his sentence reduction be to 400 months.

Woodfolk's motion will be granted and his sentence will be reduced to 324 months. The Government is correct that the facts underlying Woodfolk's conviction were horrendous. On the other hand, the efforts that he has made toward his rehabilitation while incarcerated have been extraordinary.

The Clerk is directed to enter an order reducing Woodfolk's sentence to 324 months. All other aspects of the original sentence are to remain the same.

/s/_________

J. Frederick Motz

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Woodfolk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Jun 29, 2016
Criminal No. JFM-93-0419 (D. Md. Jun. 29, 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Woodfolk

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. COREY LORENZO WOODFOLK

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Date published: Jun 29, 2016

Citations

Criminal No. JFM-93-0419 (D. Md. Jun. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

Woodfolk v. Maynard

Petitioner was then charged with a federal offense in this court for which he received a term of 50 years.…

Woodfolk v. Maynard

Petitioner was then charged with a federal offense in this court for which he received a term of 50 years.…