From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Woodard

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 4, 2022
1:20-CV-01 (FJS/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)

Opinion

1:20-CV-01 (FJS/TWD)

05-04-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. MARY L. WOODARD also known as Mary Hale; CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, as Assignee of Synchrony Bank formerly known as GE Capital Retail Bank; RENSSELAER COUNTY HOUSING RESOURCES, INC.; JOHN DOE; MARY ROE; and XYZ CORPORATION, Defendants.

PINCUS LAW GROOUP, PLLC Attorneys for the United States MARY L. WOODARD Defendant CAVALRY SPV I, LLC NO APPEARANCE Defendant RENSSELAER COUNTY NO APPEARANCE HOUSING RESOURCES, INC. Defendant JOHN DOE, MARY ROE and XYZ CORPORATION Defendants CYNTHIA MALONE, ESQ. SHERRI J. SMITH, ESQ. BARRY WEISS, ESQ.


PINCUS LAW GROOUP, PLLC

Attorneys for the United States

MARY L. WOODARD Defendant

CAVALRY SPV I, LLC NO APPEARANCE Defendant

RENSSELAER COUNTY NO APPEARANCE HOUSING RESOURCES, INC. Defendant

JOHN DOE, MARY ROE and XYZ CORPORATION Defendants

CYNTHIA MALONE, ESQ.

SHERRI J. SMITH, ESQ.

BARRY WEISS, ESQ.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND SALE

FREDERICK J. SCULLIN, JR., SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment and entry of a judgment of foreclosure and sale. See Dkt. No. 31.

II. BACKGROUND

On or about September 29, 2006, at the request of Defendant Mary L. Woodard also known as Mary Hale, Plaintiff, acting through the Rural Housing Service or successor agency, United States Department of Agriculture, lent Defendant Woodard the sum of $109,820.00, which she promised to repay with interest at 6.2500% per annum in specified monthly installments. See Dkt. No. 1, Complaint, at ¶ 2. As evidence of this indebtedness, Defendant Woodard executed and delivered to Plaintiff a Promissory Note dated September 29, 2006. See Id. at ¶ 3 & Exhibit "A" attached thereto. To secure the payment of the indebtedness, Defendant Woodard executed, acknowledged, and delivered to Plaintiff a real property mortgage dated September 29, 2006. See Id. at ¶ 4 & Exhibit "B" attached thereto. The mortgage was duly recorded in the Rensselaer County Clerk's Office on or about October 19, 2006, in Book 3775 at Page 21, Instrument No. 2006-0024881. See Id. at ¶ 5. Plaintiff is the owner and holder of the Promissory Note and Mortgage. See Id. at ¶ 6.

Plaintiff asserts that Defendant Woodard breached and violated the provisions of the Promissory Note and Mortgage by neglecting and failing to pay the installments of principal and interest when due beginning with the September 28, 2017 payment, despite due demand therefore and by failing to make payment of real property taxes when due, thereby making it necessary for Plaintiff to pay the same to protect its interest in the property. See Id. at ¶ 7.

Plaintiff brought this action against Defendants to foreclose a mortgage on real property designated as 1442 Johnsonville Road, Johnsonville, New York 12094, which is located in Rensselaer County, New York. See Id. at ¶ 4. The total balance secured by said mortgage as of August 6, 2021, is $162,615.82, comprised of the following amounts: (1) unpaid principal in the amount of $107,227.66; (2) unpaid interest through August 6, 2021, in the amount of $26,421.46 (daily interest accrual $18.3609 per day at 6.2500%); (3) subsidy to be recaptured in the amount of $9,281.07; (4) advances for insurance in the amount of $6,631.00; (5) advances for taxes in the amount of $12,436.99; (6) late charges in the amount of $61.04; and (7) advances for property maintenance/caretaker/inspections in the amount of $556.60. See Dkt. No. 31-3, Attorney's Affirmation Statement of Damages, at 1-2. Plaintiff also requests an award of fees and disbursements in the amount of $1,133.70 and an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $3,875.00. See Id. at 2.

Plaintiff filed a Notice of Pendency containing all the particulars required by law in the Office of the Clerk of the Northern District of New York and in the Rensselaer County Clerk's Office on January 3, 2020. See Dkt. No. 30 at 8-12, Attorney Affirmation for Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale, at ¶ 15 & Exhibit "G" attached thereto.

Plaintiff served Defendants with the summons and complaint, see Dkt. No. 5, and their time to answer or otherwise appear with regard to the complaint has expired and has not been extended by consent or order of this Court. Plaintiff requested a Clerk's Entry of Default against all Defendants except for John Doe, Mary Roe, and XYZ Corporation, whom Plaintiff seeks to terminate as parties in this action. See Dkt. No. 30 at 8-12, Attorney Affirmation for Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale, at ¶ 12; Dkt. No. 22, Request for Clerk's Entry of Default filed August 9, 2021; Dkt. No. 24, Clerk's Entry of Default dated August 9, 2021. Plaintiff served a separate copy of the "90 day notice," as required by New York Law on Defendant Mary L. Woodard also known as Mary Hale. See Dkt. No. 30, at 8-12, Attorney Affirmation for Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale, at ¶ 13 & Exhibit "D" attached thereto; and that notice was registered with the State of New York, see Id. & Exhibit "E" attached thereto. None of the individual Defendants are in the military service nor are they infants or incompetent persons. See Id. at ¶ 10. Finally, having reviewed the description of the property, which has been improved with a single family home, Plaintiff has determined that the mortgaged premises cannot be sold except as a single parcel. See Id. at ¶ 19.

III. DISCUSSION

A. Plaintiff's motion to amend the caption of the complaint

Plaintiff seeks to amend the caption and terminate Defendants John Doe, Mary Roe and XYZ Corporation. See Dkt. No. 31. There is no need to amend the caption. However, the Court dismisses this action against these Defendants with prejudice because "Plaintiff has ascertained that "there are no tenants or occupants residing at the premises at issue under these fictitious names." See Dkt. No. 31-2 at 1.

B. Plaintiff's motion for entry of a default judgment and judgment of foreclosure and sale

"Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides a two-step process for obtaining a default judgment." Priestley v. Headminder, Inc., 647 F.3d 497, 504 (2d Cir. 2011). First, under Rule 55(a), the plaintiff must obtain a clerk's entry of default. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(2) (providing that, "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default"); N.D.N.Y. L.R. 55.1 (requiring a party seeking a clerk's entry of default to "submit an affidavit showing that (1) the party against whom it seeks a judgment of affirmative relief is not an infant, in the military, or an incompetent person (2) a party against whom it seeks a judgment for affirmative relief has failed to plead or otherwise defend the action . . . and (3) it has properly served the pleading to which the opposing party has not responded"). Second, under Rule 55(b), the plaintiff may apply for entry of a default judgment by the clerk "[i]f the plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain" or by the court "[i]n all other cases." Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(1), (2); N.D.N.Y. L.R. 55.2(b) (providing that "[a] party shall accompany a motion to the Court for the entry of a default judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2), with a clerk's certificate of entry of a default . . ., a proposed form of default judgment, and a copy of the pleading to which no response has been made").

1. Liability

By failing to answer, Defendants are deemed to have admitted the factual allegations in the complaint. See Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.U.L. Realty Corp., 973 F.2d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 1992) (noting that "a party's default is deemed to constitute a concession of all well pleaded allegations of liability" (citations omitted)). However, "before entering default judgment, the Court must review the Complaint to determine whether Plaintiff has stated a valid claim for relief." Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Barnes, No. 3: 16-cv-00533 (BKS/DEP), 2018 WL 6028050, *5 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2018) (citing Finkel v. Romanowicz, 577 F.3d 79, 84 (2d Cir. 2009)) (other citation omitted).

Based on the allegations in the Complaint, the Court finds that Plaintiff has established Defendants' liability.

2. Damages

"[I]t is well established that '[w]hile a party's default is deemed to constitute a concession of all well pleaded allegations of liability, it is not considered an admission of damages.'" Cement & Concrete Workers Dist. Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund, Educ. & Training Fund & Other Funds v. Metro Found. Contractors Inc., 699 F.3d 230, 234 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Greyhound Exhibitgroup, Inc. v. E.L.U.L. Realty Corp., 973 F.2d 155, 158 (2d Cir. 1992)). "There must be an evidentiary basis for the damages sought by plaintiff, and a district court may determine there is sufficient evidence either based upon evidence presented at a hearing or upon a review of detailed affidavits and documentary evidence that enables the court to evaluate the proposed sum and determine an award of damages. See Tamarin v. Adam Caterers, Inc., 13 F.3d 51, 54 (2d Cir. 1993) (stating that "Rule 55(b)(2) and relevant case law give district judges much discretion in determining when it is 'necessary and proper' to hold an inquest on damages"); Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2) (providing that "[t]he court may conduct hearings . . . when, to enter or effectuate judgment, it needs to: (A) conduct an accounting; (B) determine the amount of damages; (C) establish the truth of any allegation by evidence; or (D) investigate any other matter").

In this case, the Court finds that it is not necessary to hold an evidentiary hearing because damages are calculable based on the detailed affidavits and documentary evidence that Plaintiff has provided. Thus, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for entry of a default judgment as follows:

Unpaid Principal $107,227.66 Unpaid Interest (through August 6, 2021) 26, 421.46 Subsidy to be recaptured 9, 281.07 Advances for Insurance 6, 631.00 Advances for Taxes 12, 436.99 Late Charges 61.04 Advances for Property Maintenance/ 556.60 Caretake/Inspection Total due as of August 6, 2021 $162,615.82 plus additional interest accruing on this amount from August 6, 2021, at a rate of 6.2500% per annum, through the date of entry of judgment, as well as an award of attorney's fees in the amount $3,875.00, and costs and disbursements in the amount of $1,133.70. 7 IV. CONCLUSION Having reviewed the entire file in this matter, the parties' submissions and the applicable law, and for the above-stated reasons, the Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion to terminate this action against Defendants John Doe, Mary Roe and XYZ Corporation, see Dkt. No. 31, is GRANTED and the Court dismisses Plaintiff's claims against these Defendants with prejudice; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for entry of a default judgment against the remaining Defendants, see Dkt. No. 31, is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff is awarded judgment against Defendants in the amount of $162,615.82 with interest continuing thereon at the rate of 6.2500% per annum to the date of entry of judgment and, thereafter, interest on this amount from the date of entry of judgment to the date of payment at the rate provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a) and an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $3,875.00 and costs and disbursements in the amount of $1,133.70 with interest on the award of attorney's fees and costs and disbursements continuing from the date of entry of judgment to the date of payment at the rate provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a); and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion for entry of Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale, see Dkt. No. 31, is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale is entered against Defendants for the sum of $162,615.82 with interest continuing thereon at the rate of 6.2500% per annum to the date of entry of this judgment and, thereafter, interest on this amount from the date of entry of 8 this judgment to the date of payment at the rate provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a); and the Court further ORDERS that the mortgaged premises described in the Complaint, as hereinafter set forth, being more commonly known as 1442 Johnsonville Road, Johnsonville, New York 12094, a parcel of land improved with a single family home, to be sold in and as one parcel, as a sale in one parcel will be most beneficial to the interests of the parties. The name and phone number of the servicer for Plaintiff being the United States Department of Agriculture, 1-800-414-1226; and the Court further ORDERS that the mortgaged property described in the Complaint and as hereinafter described, or such part thereof as may be sufficient to discharge the mortgage debt, the expenses of the sale, and the costs of this action as provided for in New York Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law ("RPAPL") be sold, in one parcel at a public auction to be held at the Rensselaer County Supreme Court, 80 2nd Street, Troy, New York 12180, by and under the direction of Yanci R. Herboldt, Esq., 4332 Heritage Drive, Apt. B05, Liverpool, New York 13090-2037, who is hereby appointed Referee for that purpose; that said Referee give public notice of the time and place of said sale in accordance with RPAPL § 231; and the Court further ORDERS that the Referee shall cause to be sent by mail a copy of the Notice of Sale by depositing the same in a prepaid wrapper addressed to the following: Mary L. Woodard a/k/a Mary Hale 1442 Johnsonville Road Johnsonville, New York 12094 Cavalry SPV I, LLC, as Assignee of Synchrony Bank formerly known as GE Capital Retail Bank 500 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 400 Valhalla, New York 10595 9 Rensselaer County Housing Resources, Inc. 415 River Street Troy, New York 12180; and the Court further ORDERS that the Referee shall post copies of the Notice of Sale in three (3) conspicuous public places in Rensselaer County, New York, where the premises are located; and the Court further ORDERS that the Referee cause the Notice of Sale to be published once weekly for four consecutive weeks in The Record, a newspaper of general circulation published in Rensselaer County, where the mortgaged premises are located. The Notice of Sale need not contain the full legal description of the property as set forth in "Schedule A," attached hereto, but may refer to the property as 1442 Johnsonville Road, Johnsonville, New York 12094; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff or an other party to this action may become a purchaser at such sale; and the Court further ORDERS that the Referee shall execute to the purchaser at such sale a deed of the premises sold and, upon receiving the proceeds of such sale, forthwith pay the following items: FIRST, the Referee's fees and commissions associated with said sale, not to exceed the sum of $500.00; SECOND, the Referee's advertising expenses as shown on bills to be specified in the Referee's Report of Sale; and THIRD, the sum of $162,615.82 with interest continuing thereon at the rate of 6.2500% per annum from August 6, 2021, to the date of entry of this judgment and, thereafter, interest on this amount from the date of entry of judgment to the date of payment at the rate provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a), or so much thereof as the purchase money of the mortgaged 10 premises will pay of the same and an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $3,875.00 with interest on the award of attorney's fees continuing from the date of entry of this judgment to the date of payment at the rate provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a); and the Court further ORDERS that, if Plaintiff is the purchaser of the mortgaged premises at the sale, or in the event the rights of the purchaser at the sale and the terms of the sale under this judgment shall be assigned to and acquired by Plaintiff and a valid assignment thereof filed with the Referee, the Referee shall not require Plaintiff to pay in cash the entire amount bid at said sale, but shall execute and deliver to Plaintiff a deed of the premises sold upon payment to the Referee of the amounts specified above in items marked "FIRST" and "SECOND"; that the balance of the amount bid, after deducting therefrom the amounts paid by Plaintiff, shall be allowed to Plaintiff as specified above in item marked "THIRD"; and, if after so applying the balance of the amount bid there shall be a surplus over and above the said amounts due to Plaintiff, Plaintiff shall pay to the Referee, upon delivery to it of said Referee's Deed, the amount of said surplus; and that the Referee then shall make the payments as herein directed; and the Court further ORDERS that the Referee shall take the receipt of Plaintiff or its attorney, for the amounts paid as hereinabove directed in item marked "THIRD" and file it with his Report of Sale; and the Court further ORDERS that the Referee shall deposit any surplus moneys with the Clerk of this Court within five (5) days after the same shall be received and ascertainable, to the credit of this action, to be withdrawn only on the order of a Judge of this Court; and the Court further ORDERS that the Referee shall make his Report of Sale and file it with the Clerk of this Court with all convenient speed. That if the proceeds of the sale are insufficient to pay the amounts herein directed to be paid to Plaintiff, with the expenses of the sale, interest, costs, and 11 allowances, as aforesaid, the Referee shall specify the amount of such deficiency in his Report of Sale; and the Court further ORDERS that the purchaser at such sale shall be let into possession of the premises sold upon production of the Referee's Deed to such premises; and the Court further ORDERS that each and every Defendant in this action, and all persons claiming under them, or any one of them, after filing of the notice of pendency of this action, be and they hereby are forever barred and foreclosed of all right, title, claim, interest, lien and equity of redemption in said mortgaged premises and each and every part thereof. The premises affected by this action are situated entirely within the County of Rensselaer, State of New York, and designated as 1442 Johnsonville Road, Johnsonville, New York 12094, further described in Schedule "A," attached hereto, together with all right, title and interest of the owner, if any, in and to the land lying in the streets and roads in front of and adjoining said premises, to the center line thereof, together with all fixtures and articles of personal property annexed to, installed in, or used in connection with the mortgaged premises, as is more fully set out in said Mortgage. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 SCHEDULE A OMITTED Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 4. Appeal as of Right (a) Appeal in a Civil Case. 1. (1) Time for Filing a Notice of Appeal. (A) In a civil case, except as provided in Rules 4(a)(1)(B), 4(a)(4), and 4(c), the notice of appeal required by Rule 3 must be filed with the district clerk within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order appealed from. (B) The notice of appeal may be filed by any party within 60 days after entry of the judgment or order appealed from if one of the parties is: (i) the United States; (ii) a United States agency; (iii) a United States officer or employee sued in an official capacity; or (iv) a current or former United States officer or employee sued in an individual capacity for an act or omission occurring in connection with duties performed on the United States' behalf — including all instances in which the United States represents that person when the judgment or order is entered or files the appeal for that person. (C) An appeal from an order granting or denying an application for a writ of error coram nobis is an appeal in a civil case for purposes of Rule 4(a). (2) Filing Before Entry of Judgment. A notice of appeal filed after the court announces a decision or order—but before the entry of the judgment or order—is treated as filed on the date of and after the entry. (3) Multiple Appeals. If one party timely files a notice of appeal, any other party may file a notice of appeal within 14 days after the date when the first notice was filed, or within the time otherwise prescribed by this Rule 4(a), whichever period ends later. (4) Effect of a Motion on a Notice of Appeal. (A) If a party timely files in the district court any of the following motions under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the time to file an appeal runs for all parties from the entry of the order disposing of the last such remaining motion: (i) for judgment under Rule 50(b); (ii) to amend or make additional factual findings under Rule 52(b), whether or not granting the motion would alter the judgment; (iii) for attorney's fees under Rule 54 if the district court extends the time to appeal under Rule 58; (iv) to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59; (v) for a new trial under Rule 59; or (vi) for relief under Rule 60 if the motion is filed no later than 28 days after the judgment is entered. (B)(i) If a party files a notice of appeal after the court announces or enters a judgment—but before it disposes of any motion listed in Rule 4(a)(4)(A)—the notice becomes effective to appeal a judgment or order, in whole or in part, when the order disposing of the last such remaining motion is entered. (ii) A party intending to challenge an order disposing of any motion listed in Rule 4(a)(4)(A), or a judgment's alteration or amendment upon such a motion, must file a notice of appeal, or an amended notice of appeal—in compliance with Rule 3(c)—within the time prescribed by this Rule measured from the entry of the order disposing of the last such remaining motion. (5) Motion for Extension of Time. (A) The district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if: (i) a party so moves no later than 30 days after the time prescribed by this Rule 4(a) expires; and (ii) regardless of whether its motion is filed before or during the 30 days after the time prescribed by this Rule 4(a) expires, that party shows excusable neglect or good cause. (B) A motion filed before the expiration of the time prescribed in Rule 4(a)(1) or (3) may be ex parte unless the court requires otherwise. If the motion is filed after the expiration of the prescribed time, notice must be given to the other parties in accordance with local rules. (C) No extension under this Rule 4(a)(5) may exceed 30 days after the prescribed time or 14 days after the date when the order granting the motion is entered, whichever is later. (6) Reopening the Time to File an Appeal. The district court may reopen the time to file an appeal for a period of 14 days after the date when its order to reopen is entered, but only if all the following conditions are satisfied: (A) the court finds that the moving party did not receive notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 77 (d) of the entry of the judgment or order sought to be appealed within 21 days after entry; (B) the motion is filed within 180 days after the judgment or order is entered or within 14 days after the moving party receives notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 77 (d) of the entry, whichever is earlier; and (C) the court finds that no party would be prejudiced. (7) Entry Defined. (A) A judgment or order is entered for purposes of this Rule 4(a): (i) if Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 (a) does not require a separate document, when the judgment or order is entered in the civil docket under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 79 (a); or (ii) if Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 (a) requires a separate document, when the judgment or order is entered in the civil docket under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 79(a) and when the earlier of these events occurs: • the judgment or order is set forth on a separate document, or • 150 days have run from entry of the judgment or order in the civil docket under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 79 (a). (B) A failure to set forth a judgment or order on a separate document when required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 (a) does not affect the validity of an appeal from that judgment or order.


Summaries of

United States v. Woodard

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 4, 2022
1:20-CV-01 (FJS/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Woodard

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. MARY L. WOODARD also known as Mary Hale…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: May 4, 2022

Citations

1:20-CV-01 (FJS/TWD) (N.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2022)