From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Mar 28, 2017
No. 14-10569 (11th Cir. Mar. 28, 2017)

Opinion

No. 14-10569

03-28-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALONIZA J. WILLIAMS, a.k.a Cat, Defendant - Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00038-JSM-TBM-2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

After Aloniza Williams pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, the district court imposed an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Williams appeals the district court's decision to classify and sentence him as an armed career criminal, contending that the district court erred in finding that three of his prior criminal convictions were violent felonies under ACCA. The district court predicated Williams's ACCA enhancement on four convictions for burglary under Florida law. On appeal, we affirmed Williams's sentence, concluding that Florida burglary qualified as an ACCA predicate under that statute's so-called residual clause, United States v. Williams, 603 F. App'x 919 (11th Cir. 2015) (unpublished), which the Supreme Court subsequently held violated the Constitution's guarantee of due process, see Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). Williams petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari, and that Court granted his petition, vacated our opinion affirming his sentence, and remanded for further proceedings.

Only three convictions are required to trigger the ACCA enhancement. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). --------

The government now concedes, and we agree, that Williams's ACCA-enhanced sentence must be vacated because Williams has no predicate convictions that support the enhancement. In United States v. Esprit, 841 F.3d 1235, 1240-41 (11th Cir. 2016), decided after Johnson, this Court held that Florida burglary is not a violent felony under ACCA. Williams's only potential predicate offenses were Florida burglary convictions. In light of Esprit, these convictions can no longer serve to enhance his sentence.

Accordingly, Williams's ACCA sentence is vacated, and his case is remanded to the district court for resentencing without the ACCA enhancement.

VACATED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Mar 28, 2017
No. 14-10569 (11th Cir. Mar. 28, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ALONIZA J. WILLIAMS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 28, 2017

Citations

No. 14-10569 (11th Cir. Mar. 28, 2017)