From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 7, 2015
Case No.: 2:15-cr-00029-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2015)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:15-cr-00029-GMN-VCF

10-07-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON MICHAEL WHITE, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAM FERENBACH

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 47) of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered September 9, 2015.

Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by September 26, 2015. No objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the Court has reviewed the record in this case and has determined that Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach's Recommendation should be ACCEPTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Brandon White's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 37) is DENIED.

DATED this 7th day of October, 2015.

/s/_________

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Oct 7, 2015
Case No.: 2:15-cr-00029-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. White

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON MICHAEL WHITE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 7, 2015

Citations

Case No.: 2:15-cr-00029-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Nelson

In response, the government argues that Rule 12(b)(1) does not permit the Court to “make a factual…

United States v. Meekins

The proper inquiry under Rule 12 is whether the charging document “(1) presents the essential elements of the…