From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Washington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 31, 2014
Case No. 13-10551 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2014)

Summary

finding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to consult with defendant regarding an appeal where, among other things, the plea agreement contained an appeal waiver and the agreement was explained at the plea colloquy

Summary of this case from Stoltz v. United States

Opinion

Case No. 10-20202 Case No. 12-15266 Case No. 11-20248 Case No. 12-15250 Case No. 11-20469 Case No. 13-10551

03-31-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. GWENDOLYN WASHINGTON, Defendant/Petitioner,


HON. JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is a report and recommendation filed on September 5, 2013 by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives. On September 26, 2013 Defendant filed objections to the report and recommendation. On October 17, 2013 the Government filed a response to the objections.

This Court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court "may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." Id.

Having reviewed the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court, and Defendant's motions to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 are DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this date, March 31, 2014, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

William Barkholz

Case Manager


Summaries of

United States v. Washington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 31, 2014
Case No. 13-10551 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2014)

finding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to consult with defendant regarding an appeal where, among other things, the plea agreement contained an appeal waiver and the agreement was explained at the plea colloquy

Summary of this case from Stoltz v. United States
Case details for

United States v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. GWENDOLYN WASHINGTON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 31, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-10551 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Stoltz v. United States

As the Court has found, she knowingly and voluntarily entered into a plea agreement with the Government,…

Nix v. United States

Based on the record before the Court, the Court agrees with Judge Poplin that Attorney Cravens's duty to…