From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Stephens

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 4, 2010
376 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6154.

April 29, 2010.

May 4, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cr-00281-HEH-1).

Lorenzo Deshon Stephens, Appellant Pro Se. Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Lorenzo Deshon Stephens appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Stephens, No. 3:06-cr-00281-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Stephens

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 4, 2010
376 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

United States v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo Deshon STEPHENS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 4, 2010

Citations

376 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Long

He cannot now escape the strictures of Rule 32 by relying on Rule 36. See United States v. Wilkes, 376…