From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Snyder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 2, 2013
520 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-6148

05-02-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBIN NEIL SNYDER, Defendant - Appellant.

Robin Neil Snyder, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00155-CCB-1; 1:11-cv-03357-CCB) Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robin Neil Snyder, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robin Neil Snyder seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Snyder has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

United States v. Snyder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 2, 2013
520 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Snyder

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ROBIN NEIL SNYDER…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

520 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Snyder v. Hollingsworth

The Fourth Circuit affirmed Judge Blake's findings. See United States v. Snyder, 520 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir.…