From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Nov 12, 2020
Criminal Case No. DKC 12-0149 (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2020)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. DKC 12-0149

11-12-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DENNIS SMITH


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Mr. Smith filed a motion for consideration for compassionate release/reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(a) on July 9, 2020. ECF No. 40. Mr. Smith conveys his apprehension that he may contract the COVID-19 virus and notes that he is highly susceptible because he is a long-time smoker. For the following reasons, the motion for compassionate release will be denied.

Ordinarily, "[t]he court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed." 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2018). This general rule is subject to certain exceptions, including the compassionate release provision, which allows the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") to seek a modification of a prisoner's sentence. See id. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Under the First Step Act of 2018, the compassionate release provision was modified to allow prisoners also to seek a sentencing reduction directly from the Court. The provision now provides, in relevant part, that:

The court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed except that:
(1) in any case that—

(A) the court, upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, or upon motion of the defendant after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant's behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such request by the warden of the defendant's facility, whichever is earlier, may reduce the term of imprisonment (and may impose a term of probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed the unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment), after considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable, if it finds that—

(i) extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction;


* * *

and that such a reduction is consistent with applicable policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission[.]

Mr. Smith is confined at FCI Allenwood Low where he asserts that the COVID-19 virus is an extraordinary and compelling circumstance which merits transfer to home confinement or release. Mr. Smith submitted his request to the warden on April 2, 2020. (ECF No. 43). More than 30 days elapsed prior to the filing of the instant motion. A prisoner may file a motion for compassionate release only "after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant's behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant's facility, whichever is earlier . . . ." 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Thus, Mr. Smith has satisfied the administrative exhaustion requirement.

As of November 12, 2020, the Bureau of Prisons website reports that no inmates or staff members are positive for COVID-19 at Allenwood Low FCI. COVID-19 Coronavirus, https://www.bop.gov/ coronavirus/ (last visited November 12, 2020). Mr. Smith is serving a 150-month sentence imposed on February 1, 2013, after being convicted of transporting a minor to engage in prostitution and sex trafficking of a minor. According to the BOP website, his current projected release date is November 23, 2022.

While all share the concern over the public health challenges caused by COVID-19, and appreciate the heightened anxiety experienced by those incarcerated in correctional facilities, the generalized and unspecific reason stated by Mr. Smith does not satisfy the standard for compassionate release. See, e.g., United States v. Hood, 2020 WL 2091070 (W.D.N.C. April 30, 2020) ("Without a particularized susceptibility to the disease and a particularized risk of contracting the disease at his prison facility, . . . Defendant has not shown that 'extraordinary and compelling reasons' warrant his release.") As pointed out by Judge Bell, the BOP has instituted enhanced health and safety regulations to combat the spread of the disease. See also, United States v. Humphries, 2020 WL 2331247 (W.D.N.C. May 11, 2020) ("[T]he mere fact that the Defendant faces a potential risk of contracting COVID-19 is not sufficient to justify his release. As the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently noted, 'the mere existence of COVID-19 in society and the possibility that it may spread to a particular prison alone cannot independently justify compassionate release, especially considering BOP's statutory role, and its extensive and professional efforts to curtail the virus's spread.' United States v. Raia, 954 F.3d 594, 597 (3d Cir. 2020)."

Accordingly, Mr. Smith's motion for compassionate release (ECF No. 40) BE, and the same hereby IS, DENIED. November 12, 2020

/s/_________

DEBORAH K. CHASANOW

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Nov 12, 2020
Criminal Case No. DKC 12-0149 (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DENNIS SMITH

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Date published: Nov 12, 2020

Citations

Criminal Case No. DKC 12-0149 (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2020)