From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 9, 1979
594 F.2d 1084 (5th Cir. 1979)

Opinion

No. 77-5387.

May 9, 1979.

Eugene Loftin, Jacksonville, Fla. (Court-appointed) for Lee.

James L. Harrison, Jacksonville, Fla., for Smith.

John J. Daley, Jr., U.S. Atty., Curtis S. Fallgatter, Asst. U.S. Attys., Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; John A. Reed, Jr., Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion January 17, 1979, 5 Cir., 1979, 588 F.2d 111)

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, GODBOLD and FAY, Circuit Judges.


The Government has filed a petition for rehearing in this case, insisting that the Court based its reversal of appellant Lee's conviction on errors of law and fact. In response to one of the points raised in the petition, we add clarifying language to the first sentence of the second full paragraph on page 119 so that it reads:

The Court should have explained that in order to secure the conviction of a particular defendant, the Government had to prove two distinct things: (1) that a conspiracy began in late July (and continued through November 16, 1976) and (2) that as part of the common scheme, that defendant knowingly became part of and participated in the conspiracy.

As modified, our opinion stands; the petition for rehearing is DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 9, 1979
594 F.2d 1084 (5th Cir. 1979)
Case details for

United States v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. SAMUEL S. SMITH AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 9, 1979

Citations

594 F.2d 1084 (5th Cir. 1979)

Citing Cases

United States v. Rodriguez

Houltin's holding was adopted without comment by United States v. Dyar, 574 F.2d 1385 (5th Cir.), cert.…

U.S. v. King

Although one clause from the Jacobson opinion does state that a defendant's predisposition must be proven…