From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Shipton

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Feb 11, 2020
No. 19-1926 (8th Cir. Feb. 11, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-1926

02-11-2020

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dennis Gene Shipton Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo [Unpublished] Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Dennis Shipton appeals after the district court denied a pro se motion in his criminal case, in which he sought a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018 (FSA), see Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194 (2018). Upon de novo review of the record, see United States v. McDonald, 944 F.3d 769, 771 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review), we agree with the district court that Shipton was not eligible for a sentence reduction under section 401 of the FSA, as he was sentenced prior to December 21, 2018, see United States v. Wiseman, 932 F.3d 411, 417 (6th Cir. 2019) (§ 401 of FSA did not apply to defendant who was sentenced prior to December 21, 2018). Accordingly, we affirm.

The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. --------


Summaries of

United States v. Shipton

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Feb 11, 2020
No. 19-1926 (8th Cir. Feb. 11, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Shipton

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dennis Gene Shipton…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Feb 11, 2020

Citations

No. 19-1926 (8th Cir. Feb. 11, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Smith

However, as Defendant acknowledges, the amendments in Section 401 are not retroactive. See United States v.…

United States v. Jimenez-Rejon

Section 401 of the First Step Act specifically stated that the amendment only applied to “any offense that…