From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Serrano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Jan 9, 2018
Case No. CR17-223RSL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 9, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CR17-223RSL

01-09-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARK BAUTISTA SERRANO, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS DEADLINE

This matter comes before the Court on defendant's unopposed "Motion to Continue Trial Date and Pretrial Motions Deadline." Dkt. # 25. Having considered the facts set forth in the motion, the defendant's knowing and voluntary waiver, and defense counsel's representation that the United States does not oppose this motion, the Court finds as follows:

1. The Court adopts the facts set forth in the unopposed motion. Specifically, that Mr. Serrano's current attorney was substituted as counsel December 20, 2017, and that counsel has been given more than 360 pages of discovery that still require review. The Court accordingly finds that a failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

2. The Court finds that a failure to grant a continuance would likely result in a miscarriage of justice, as set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i).

3. The Court finds that the additional time requested is a reasonable period of delay, as defense counsel needs additional time review discovery, to investigate the matter, to gather evidence material to the defense, and to consider possible defenses; and that the additional time requested between the current trial date of February 5, 2018, and the proposed trial date of May 21, 2018 is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time to prepare for trial considering all of the facts set forth above.

4. The Court further finds that such a continuance would serve the ends of justice, and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a more speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

5. Defendant has signed a waiver indicating that he has been advised of his right to a speedy trial and that, after consulting with counsel, he has knowingly and voluntarily waived that right and consented to the continuation of his trial to a date up to and including June 30, 2018, Dkt. # 26, which will permit trial to start on May 21, 2018, per defense counsel's request.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date be continued from February 5, 2018, to May 21, 2018.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pretrial motions cutoff date be continued to April 23, 2018.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of time from the current trial date of February 5, 2018, up to and including June 30, 2018, shall be excludable time pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq. The period of delay attributable to the filing and granting of this motion is excluded for speedy trial purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(D), (h)(7)(A), and (h)(7)(B).

DATED this 9th day of January, 2018.

/s/_________

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Serrano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Jan 9, 2018
Case No. CR17-223RSL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 9, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Serrano

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARK BAUTISTA SERRANO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Date published: Jan 9, 2018

Citations

Case No. CR17-223RSL (W.D. Wash. Jan. 9, 2018)