From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Schmutte

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Jan 23, 2018
No. 16-2176 (7th Cir. Jan. 23, 2018)

Opinion

No. 16-2176

01-23-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHANE SCHMUTTE, Defendant-Appellant.


NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. No. 1:14-CR-00177 Sarah Evans Barker, Judge.

Circuit Judge Posner participated in the oral argument in this case but retired on September 2, 2017 and did not participate in the decision of this appeal. The appeal is being resolved by a quorum of the panel under 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). --------

ORDER

Defendant-appellant Shane Schmutte pled guilty to possessing a gun as a felon. The district court found that Schmutte had at least three prior convictions for violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act and sentenced him to the mandatory minimum of fifteen years in prison. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). The issue in this appeal is whether Schmutte's prior Indiana conviction for Class B burglary should count as a violent felony under the Act. To decide this issue, we must apply the categorical method; the details of Schmutte's actual crime do not matter. See, e.g., Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016).

Class B burglary under Indiana law at the time Schmutte was convicted in 2002 required proof that he broke and entered the building or structure of another person with intent to commit a felony in it, and either that he committed the crime while armed with a deadly weapon or that the building or structure was a dwelling or a structure used for religious worship. Ind. Code § 35-43-2-1(1) (2002) (Indiana recodified its criminal statutes in 2014). The decisive issue is whether Class B burglary qualifies as "generic" burglary under the Armed Career Criminal Act, as interpreted in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990). Taylor held that "generic" burglary is defined as "an unlawful or unprivileged entry into, or remaining in, a building or other structure, with intent to commit a crime." 495 U.S. at 598.

We recently held that a conviction for Indiana Class B burglary is categorically a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act. United States v. Foster, 877 F.3d 343 (7th Cir. 2017). Foster in turn followed United States v. Perry, 862 F.3d 620 (7th Cir. 2017), in which we held that the lesser included offense of Class C burglary under Indiana law also qualifies as a violent felony under the Act. The holding and reasoning of Foster apply to appellant Schmutte in this case. He qualifies as an armed career criminal under the act, and the district court properly imposed the mandatory minimum sentence. The judgment of the district court is therefore

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Schmutte

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit
Jan 23, 2018
No. 16-2176 (7th Cir. Jan. 23, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Schmutte

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHANE SCHMUTTE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Date published: Jan 23, 2018

Citations

No. 16-2176 (7th Cir. Jan. 23, 2018)

Citing Cases

Harrell v. United States

Id. at 17-18. In response, the United States argues that Mr. Harrell's claim under Johnson and Mathis is…

Ware v. United States

862 F.3d 620, 624 (7th Cir. 2017) (regarding Class C burglary). Shortly thereafter, in United States v.…