From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Schley

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 15, 2024
CR22-166 JCC (W.D. Wash. Jul. 15, 2024)

Opinion

CR22-166 JCC

07-15-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW SCHLEY, Defendant.

Erin H. Becker Assistant U.S. Attorney


Erin H. Becker Assistant U.S. Attorney

[PROPOSED] ORDER AUTHORIZING RETESTING OF DRUG EXHIBIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEA STANDARD PRACTICES

HON. JOHN C. COUGHENOUR SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

The defendant, Matthew Schley, has moved for an Order authorizing the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) to produce Exhibit 7, as described in DEA Form 113, “Chemical Analysis Report,” LIMS Number: 2022-SFL7-03728, dated March 23, 2023, for qualitative and quantitative retesting of the controlled substance contained therein by NMS Labs, 2300 Stratford Avenue, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania 19090-0437. The government does not object to the retesting, but objected to certain aspects of the proposed order. Defendant has agreed to waive any challenges to chain of custody of Exhibit 7 incident to or arising from the defense examination, and will abide by the following conditions under which the production shall occur.

Upon consideration of the motion, the positions of the parties with respect to the contents of the order, and applicable law,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)(E), that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) forensic laboratory shall extract samples from Exhibit 7, as described in DEA Form 113, “Chemical Analysis Report,” LIMS Number: 2022-SFL7-03728, dated March 23, 2023, sufficient in its discretion to perform the qualitative and quantitative analyses; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the DEA forensic laboratory shall deliver, in a manner it deems consistent with the type and quantity of controlled substance at issue, and considering the defense expert's proximity to the DEA forensic laboratory, a representative sample of the exhibit identified above to the defense expert, which has been specifically identified as NMS Labs, 2300 Stratford Avenue, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania 19090-0437. The defense expert shall possess and present in advance to the DEA forensic laboratory, as a prerequisite to the delivery of the exhibit, a current and valid DEA registration (DEA # RN0370306) sufficient to perform the qualitative and quantitative analyses of the schedule of the controlled substance at issue, in accord and in full compliance with the applicable DEA registration procedures, found at 21 C.F.R. § 1301.11 et seq.; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon delivery of the exhibit to the defense expert, the expert shall sign and return by Registered Mail, Return Receipt Requested, all accompanying forms (including Form DEA-12, “Receipt For Cash Or Other Items”) indicating receipt of the sample. The defense expert shall conduct the identification and quantitative analysis (calculated as the hydrochloride salt form) ordered herein, and shall provide the DEA forensic laboratory with a Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746. The Declaration will state the quantity of each exhibit consumed during analysis (if any) as well as the weight of each exhibit both received from and returned to the DEA forensic laboratory. The Declaration shall be delivered to the DEA forensic laboratory immediately upon completion of the analyses ordered herein; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(B), that the defendant shall provide the assigned Assistant United States Attorney with a copy of the results or reports of the inspections and weighing provided under this Order; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

(1) Any reweighing of the exhibit will be conducted first and separately from any retesting involving qualitative and/or quantitative analyses of the laboratory exhibit, if such a separate order is entered;

(2) The defense shall coordinate with the Government a convenient date and time for the analyses ordered herein, which date shall be within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order;

(3) The defense expert's analyses may be observed by a government law enforcement officer, who reserves the right to videotape the analyses or any portion thereof;

(4) The defense expert is responsible for safeguarding the exhibit/samples, preserving the chain of custody in a manner to faithfully protect its integrity;

(5) The defense expert is responsible for repackaging each internal sample/exhibit package into a heat-sealed evidentiary envelope, which heat-sealed container shall be placed into a separate heat-sealed envelope, which shall be secured in such a manner that tampering will be readily observable;

(6) Upon completion of any other reanalysis, the defense expert shall return any residual substance and its original packaging to the law enforcement officer or, where applicable, to the originating DEA laboratory by secure method, not to include regular mail. The method can be secured delivery services (i.e., barcode tracking systems) offered by the United States Postal Service (such as registered mail) or by a commercial carrier;

(7) All reanalysis must be completed within ten (10) calendar days from the date of receipt of the sample/exhibit. Return of any residual substance and its original packaging must occur within five calendar days following completion of the reanalysis.

(8) Any failure to follow the aforementioned procedures will render the reanalysis results scientifically unreliable, as those terms are used in the Federal Rules of Evidence;

(9) Any failure by the defense to maintain the proper chain of custody will not render Exhibit 7, as described in DEA Form 113, “Chemical Analysis Report,” LIMS Number: 2022-SFL7-03728, dated March 23, 2023, inadmissible for this reason.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Schley

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 15, 2024
CR22-166 JCC (W.D. Wash. Jul. 15, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Schley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW SCHLEY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 15, 2024

Citations

CR22-166 JCC (W.D. Wash. Jul. 15, 2024)