From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sarratt

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 26, 2022
No. 22-6335 (4th Cir. Aug. 26, 2022)

Opinion

22-6335

08-26-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TYE LANFORD SARRATT, Defendant-Appellant.

Tye Lanford Sarratt, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: August 23, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:01-cr-00016-GCM-1)

Tye Lanford Sarratt, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HEYTENS, Circuit Judge, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Tye Lanford Sarratt appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for compassionate release and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Sarratt

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 26, 2022
No. 22-6335 (4th Cir. Aug. 26, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Sarratt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TYE LANFORD SARRATT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 26, 2022

Citations

No. 22-6335 (4th Cir. Aug. 26, 2022)

Citing Cases

United States v. Ramirez

Rather, it is a consequence of the criminal choices that Defendant made. "[F]amily hardship is normally not a…

Benton v. United States

Petitioner also does not claim that her mother cannot care for herself or that her adult daughter cannot care…