From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sam

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
May 5, 2021
No. CR-12-08176-001-PCT-JAT (D. Ariz. May. 5, 2021)

Opinion

No. CR-12-08176-001-PCT-JAT

05-05-2021

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Tyrone James Sam, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Tyrone James Sam's motion for compassionate release. (Doc. 76). The government has responded (Doc. 78), and the Court now rules.

On August 27, 2013, Sam pleaded guilty to abusive sexual contact in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 2244(a)(5), and the Court sentenced Sam to 135-month's incarceration followed by lifetime supervised release. (Doc. 56 at 1). On April 5, 2021, Sam moved for compassionate release, arguing that extraordinary and compelling reasons justify his release from incarceration. (Doc. 76). See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

Section 3582(c)(1)(A), however, provides that a defendant may bring such a motion "after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant's behalf or the lapse of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant's facility, whichever is earlier . . . ." "[T]he language of § 3582 contains no signal that administrative exhaustion or the passage of at least 30 days is optional." United States v. Weidenhamer, No. CR-16-01072-001-PHX-ROS, 2020 WL 1929200, at *2 (D. Ariz. Apr. 21, 2020); see also United States v. Alvarez Espinoza, No. CR-08-00611-02-PHX-DGC, 2020 WL 3200344, at *2 (D. Ariz. June 15, 2020) (collecting cases in which courts in the Ninth Circuit have concluded § 3582's exhaustion requirement is "mandatory and cannot be waived by the Court"). "Thus, the Court may not consider a defendant's motion without proof that he meets this exhaustion requirement." United States v. Moore, No. CR-16-01202-008-PHX-DJH, 2021 WL 1056445, at *2 (D. Ariz. Mar. 18, 2021).

In this case, Sam has failed to demonstrate that he exhausted his administrative rights. Although Sam's motion describes the substantive basis for compassionate release, Sam offers no proof that he complied or attempted to comply with available administrative procedures.

Because Sam has failed to do so,

IT IS ORDERED that Sam's motion for compassionate release (Doc. 78) is DENIED without prejudice.

Dated this 5th day of May, 2021.

/s/_________

James A. Teilborg

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Sam

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
May 5, 2021
No. CR-12-08176-001-PCT-JAT (D. Ariz. May. 5, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Sam

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Tyrone James Sam, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: May 5, 2021

Citations

No. CR-12-08176-001-PCT-JAT (D. Ariz. May. 5, 2021)