From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ryan

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 11, 2015
15-CR-116 JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, NOA E. OREN, Assistant Federal Defender, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, JOSEPH RYAN.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         The United States of America, through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Michelle Rodriguez, and defendant, Joseph Ryan, through Assistant Federal Defender, Noa E. Oren, stipulate that the Status Conference, currently scheduled for September 15, 2015, be continued to September 22, 2015 at 9:15 a.m.

         The continuance is requested because the parties are negotiating a settlement of this case.

         The parties agree that the above reasons constitute good cause to extend the time for preliminary hearing under Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting the defendants' request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4).

/s/Michelle Rodriguez

          ORDER

         Finding good cause, the Court orders the preliminary hearing continued to September 22, 2015, at 9:15 a.m., before the Hon. John A. Mendez; and, time excluded for the reasons set forth above. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the defendants' request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.


Summaries of

United States v. Ryan

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 11, 2015
15-CR-116 JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH RYAN, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 11, 2015

Citations

15-CR-116 JAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2015)