From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rogers

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2014
567 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-6084

04-22-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SHIRLEY ANN ROGERS, Defendant - Appellant.

Shirley Ann Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:12-cr-00857-GRA-1) Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shirley Ann Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shirley Ann Rogers appeals the district court's order denying her motion seeking modification of her sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rogers, No. 6:12-cr-00857-GRA-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Rogers

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2014
567 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SHIRLEY ANN ROGERS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 22, 2014

Citations

567 F. App'x 202 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Watford v. United States

That said, the court "properly denies a motion of property if the [petitioner] lacks entitlement to 'lawful…