From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Rodriguez-Barcenas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 18, 2017
No. 15-50394 (9th Cir. Apr. 18, 2017)

Opinion

No. 15-50394

04-18-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANGELINO RODRIGUEZ-BARCENAS, a.k.a. Manuel Honorio Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:13-cr-07096-DMS MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California
Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Angelino Rodriguez-Barcenas appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Rodriguez-Barcenas's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

Because Rodriguez-Barcenas has fully served his sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised release, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Rodriguez-Barcenas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 18, 2017
No. 15-50394 (9th Cir. Apr. 18, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Rodriguez-Barcenas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANGELINO…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 18, 2017

Citations

No. 15-50394 (9th Cir. Apr. 18, 2017)

Citing Cases

United States v. King

In United States v. Verdin , 243 F.3d 1174, 1177–79 (9th Cir. 2001), we distinguished Spencer because, in…