From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ries

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 10, 2005
122 F. App'x 347 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted February 7, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Jonathan B. Conklin, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David L. Ries, Federal Correctional Institution, Lisbon, OH, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding.

Before FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

David L. Ries appeals the district court's order of April 16, 2003, dismissing and denying in part his various post-judgment motions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's April 16, 2003 order.

Ries' Emergency Application for Remand and Order for Immediate Release, filed February 1, 2005, is denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ries

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 10, 2005
122 F. App'x 347 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Ries

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. David L. RIES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 10, 2005

Citations

122 F. App'x 347 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

Yanagi v. Bank of Am. (In re Simon)

Id. Card v. Duker, 122 Fed. Appx. 347, 349 (9th Cir. 2005) ("The Supreme Court has thus not extended tolling…

Yanagi v. Bank of Am. (In re Herrero)

Id. Card v. Duker, 122 Fed. Appx. 347, 349 (9th Cir. 2005) ("The Supreme Court has thus not extended tolling…