From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Reeh

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Feb 24, 1984
725 F.2d 633 (11th Cir. 1984)

Opinion

No. 82-6024.

February 24, 1984.

Carlton Carlton, Philip Carlton, Jr., Thomas A. Wells, University of Miami, School of Law, Miami, Fla., for Reeh, Sprecher, Jorden and Ryan.

Stanley Marcus, U.S. Atty., James G. Adams, III, Joseph R. Buchanan, Paul A. DiPaolo, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.


In this marijuana case the district court denied a motion to suppress as evidence the seized marijuana. In the subsequent bench trial defendants were found guilty. After a notice of appeal was filed, defendants filed what the district court deemed a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The district judge certified to this court that he was disposed to grant the motion should this court remand the case in accordance with the procedure approved in U.S. v. Fuentes-Lozano, 580 F.2d 724, 725-26 (5th Cir. 1978) (per curiam).

The case is REMANDED to the district court for its ruling on the motion for new trial.


Summaries of

United States v. Reeh

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Feb 24, 1984
725 F.2d 633 (11th Cir. 1984)
Case details for

United States v. Reeh

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. RICHARD HARRY REEH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Feb 24, 1984

Citations

725 F.2d 633 (11th Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Ellsworth

The proper procedure after an appeal is taken is for a motion to be filed with the district court; the…

United States v. Reeh

The crew members, who turned out to be Americans, not Canadians, were arrested and taken to Miami. Each was…