From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ramos

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 26, 2024
CR23-171 RSM (W.D. Wash. Jul. 26, 2024)

Opinion

CR23-171 RSM

07-26-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MOSSES RAMOS, aka MOSES RAMOS, Defendant.

KRISTA K. BUSH Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office


KRISTA K. BUSH

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

STIPULATED ORDER OF FORFEITURE

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion for Entry of an Order of Forfeiture (“Motion”), seeking to forfeit Defendant Mosses Ramos' interest in the following property to the United States:

• A judgment for a sum of money (also known as a forfeiture money judgment) in the amount of $5,000, reflecting the proceeds Defendant Ramos personally obtained from the Conspiracy to Distribute Controlled Substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C), and 846.

The Court, having reviewed the Motion, as well as the other papers and pleadings filed in this matter, hereby FINDS that entry of an Order of Forfeiture is appropriate because:

• The proceeds of Conspiracy to Distribute Controlled Substances, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C), and 846, are forfeitable pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(a);
• In the Plea Agreement he entered on May 30, 2024, Defendant Ramos agreed to forfeit the above-identified sum of money, which reflects the proceeds he obtained from the Conspiracy to Distribute Controlled Substances (Dkt. No. 127, ¶ 12);
• This sum of money is personal to the Defendant, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (“Fed. R. Crim. P.”) 32.2(c)(1); no third-party ancillary process is required before forfeiting it; and
• This motion is based on the following procedural facts, which are reflected in the pleadings filed and docket entries made in this matter.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COURT ORDERS:

1. Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(a) and his Plea Agreement, Defendant Ramos' interest in the above-identified sum of money in the amount of $5,000 is fully and finally forfeited, in its entirety, to the United States;

2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4)(A)-(B), this Order will become final as to Defendant Ramos at the time he is sentenced; it will be made part of the sentence; and it will be included in the judgment;

3. No right, title, or interest in the above-identified sum of money exists in any party other than the United States;

4. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e), in order to satisfy this sum of money, in whole or in part, the United States may move to amend this Order, at any time, to include substitute property having a value not to exceed this sum of money in the amount of $5,000; and

5. The Court will retain jurisdiction in this case for the purpose of enforcing this Order, as necessary.

I IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Ramos

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 26, 2024
CR23-171 RSM (W.D. Wash. Jul. 26, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Ramos

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MOSSES RAMOS, aka MOSES RAMOS…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 26, 2024

Citations

CR23-171 RSM (W.D. Wash. Jul. 26, 2024)