From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Powell

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 7, 1970
421 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1970)

Opinion

No. 23670.

January 7, 1970.

Kent Ten Brink (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

David Wallen (argued), David H. Fox, Robert A. Browning, Robert L. Brosio, Asst. U.S. Attys., Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges, and PLUMMER, District Judge.

Honorable Raymond E. Plummer, United States District Judge, District of Alaska, sitting by designation.


This appeal follows Powell's conviction for having refused to submit to induction into the Military Service. 50 U.S.C. App. § 462.

Powell's claim to conscientious objector status was considered by his local board and rejected. He was classified 1-A, eligible for military service, and advised of that fact. He was also advised by his local board of his right to appeal his classification, but he failed to avail himself of that right. The District Court held that since Powell did not exhaust the administrative remedies available to him, he could not challenge the board's classification in the courts. The precise question was under consideration by our court, en banc, at the time of oral argument of the case at hand. We have now resolved it, and our disposition is fatal to Powell's appeal. Lockhart v. United States, 420 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. Dec. 18, 1969) (en banc).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Powell

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 7, 1970
421 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1970)
Case details for

United States v. Powell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Robert Allen POWELL, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 7, 1970

Citations

421 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

United States v. Gress

We do not need to determine if appellant's letter, which accompanied his incomplete Form 150, would satisfy…