From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Pavao-Kaaekuahiwi

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 15, 2023
2:22-cr-00055-GMN-EJY-1 (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cr-00055-GMN-EJY-1

08-15-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TERANN PAVAO-KAAEKUAHIWI, Defendant.


ORDER

Gloria M. Navarro, United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is the Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release, (ECF No. 8), filed by Defendant Terann Pavao-Kaaekuahiwi (“Defendant”). The Government filed a Notice of Non-Opposition, (ECF No. 10), stating it does oppose Defendant's Motion, and that Defendant's Probation Officer “supports early termination of supervised release in this case.” (Notice Non-Opp. 1:16-24, ECF No. 10).

Also pending before the Court are Defendant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel, (ECF No. 5), and Motion to Seal Financial Affidavit, (ECF No. 6).

The Court has considered the relevant factors and finds that Defendant meets the criteria for early termination of supervised release. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release, (ECF No. 8), is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel, (ECF No. 6), and Motion to Seal Financial Affidavit, (ECF No. 6) are GRANTED.

Assistant Federal Public Defender Heida A. Ojeda filed Defendant's Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release the same day she filed Defendant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel “in anticipation [] she would be appointed counsel in this matter.” United States v. Eastlick, Nos. 2:18-cr-00286, 2:18-cr-00288, 2021 WL 2459468, at *2 (D. Idaho June 15, 2021). “Thus, she is appointed as counsel nunc pro tunc to the date she filed the Motion.” United States v. Eastlick, Nos. 2:18-cr-00286, 2:18-cr-00288, 2021 WL 2459468, at *2 (D. Idaho June 15, 2021).

The Judicial Conference of the United Stats promulgated its current Policy on Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files in 2008. The policy provides, in part, that financial affidavits filed in seeking representation pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act “shall not be included in the public case file and should not be made available to the public at the courthouse or via remote electronic access[.]” Privacy Policy for Electronic Case Files, Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Case Files, (last visited August 19, 2023), https://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/judiciary-policies/privacy-policy-electronic-case-files. The Court finds good cause to seal Defendant's Financial Affidavit, as it is a document restricted from public view or access pursuant to the Policy. See United States v. Capri, No. 20-cr-00096, 2022 WL 1128934, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 15, 2022) (sealing a defendant's financial affidavit filed in seeking representation pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act).


Summaries of

United States v. Pavao-Kaaekuahiwi

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 15, 2023
2:22-cr-00055-GMN-EJY-1 (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. Pavao-Kaaekuahiwi

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TERANN PAVAO-KAAEKUAHIWI…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 15, 2023

Citations

2:22-cr-00055-GMN-EJY-1 (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2023)