From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Panter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 12, 2012
1:11-cv-3052-CL (D. Or. Apr. 12, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-cv-3052-CL

04-12-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DUANE H. PANTER; MARCIA DOERR, Trustee of Saved by Grace, a Trust; PHYLLIS PANTER, Trustee of the Panter Family Trust; FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY; CACV of Colorado, LLC; and JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON, Defendants.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (# 91), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although the notice of the Report sent by the Clerk to defendant Panter was returned unopened with an unsigned note, defendant Panter did not file objections to the Report. Although no objections have been filed, I review the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I find no error in the report. Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (# 91) is adopted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Panter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Apr 12, 2012
1:11-cv-3052-CL (D. Or. Apr. 12, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Panter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DUANE H. PANTER; MARCIA DOERR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Apr 12, 2012

Citations

1:11-cv-3052-CL (D. Or. Apr. 12, 2012)

Citing Cases

Ewing v. Isaac

(“[D]efault cannot be entered unless documentation establishes that a defendant has been served with a…