From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mostafavi-Kashani

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 28, 1972
469 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-1550.

September 28, 1972.

John S. Lane, Long Beach, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Barbara Meiers, Eric A. Nobles, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before BROWNING, HUFSTEDLER, and CHOY, Circuit Judges.


Appellant appeals from his conviction for knowing failure to keep his Selective Service local board advised of a current address where mail could reach him. (50 U.S.C. App. § 462.)

The board made repeated unsuccessful efforts to reach him through the mailing addresses that he furnished. He did inform his board at one time that he was enrolled in Los Angeles City College and that he was an alien. Substantial compliance with Section 462 requires more than giving the board a few clues by which the registrant can be located.

The evidence amply sustained the district court's conclusion that appellant's failure to keep his board informed of his current address was deliberate. The pattern of appellant's conduct gave every indication of evasive tactics to avoid receiving mail from the board. The record is unlike Ward v. United States, (1953) 344 U.S. 924, 73 S.Ct. 494, 97 L.Ed. 711. In Ward the registrant furnished his board with his employer's complete address, and the evidence showed that he received mail at that address. No similar showing was made in this case.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Mostafavi-Kashani

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 28, 1972
469 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

United States v. Mostafavi-Kashani

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. SEYED NOUREDDIN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 28, 1972

Citations

469 F.2d 224 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

United States v. Yingling

Certainly, substantial compliance with the requirement that a registrant advise the Local Board of his…

United States v. Seligson

United States v. Haug, supra, 150 F.2d at 914. It is overwhelmingly clear on the evidence that defendant was…