From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Moschetta

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.[fn*] Unit B
Nov 4, 1982
690 F.2d 488 (5th Cir. 1982)

Opinion

Nos. 80-5270, 80-5475.

November 4, 1982.

Martin R. Raskin, Sp. Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Miami, Fla., Theodore G. Gilinsky, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Neal Sonnett, Miami, Fla., for Moschetta.

Steadman Stahl, Joseph A. Varon, Hollywood, Fla., for Spieler.

Joseph S. Paglino, Miami, Fla., for Deutsch.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before TJOFLAT and FAY, Circuit Judges, and DYER, Senior Circuit Judge.



In accord with the remand of the Supreme Court of the United States, ___ U.S. ___, 102 S.Ct. 2919, 73 L.Ed.2d 1324, the suppression of the evidence by the United States District Court is reversed. Probable cause existing the warrantless search of the automobile was proper under United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. ___, 102 U.S. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982).


Summaries of

United States v. Moschetta

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.[fn*] Unit B
Nov 4, 1982
690 F.2d 488 (5th Cir. 1982)
Case details for

United States v. Moschetta

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MATTHEW J. MOSCHETTA AND…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.[fn*] Unit B

Date published: Nov 4, 1982

Citations

690 F.2d 488 (5th Cir. 1982)

Citing Cases

People v. Ruggles

It may be that the known presence of a firearm in a closed container would, in some situations at least, pose…