From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 2, 1991
951 F.2d 166 (8th Cir. 1991)

Opinion

Nos. 90-2534, 90-2535, 90-2958 and 90-5375.

December 2, 1991.

Robert Scott Moreland, Duluth, Minn., for appellant.

Lynn A. Zentner, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, Donald D. Aslop, Chief Judge.


ORDER

On July 29, 1991, the court notified the parties that rehearing en banc had been granted in these four cases. Rehearing shall be stayed in Moore and Bradley, as those cases raise the jurisdiction issue as to whether the attorney general or the sentencing judge has jurisdiction to give credit on the sentence. This stay shall remain in effect pending hearing and disposition of United States v. Wilson, 916 F.2d 1115 (6th Cir. 1990), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 48, 116 L.Ed.2d 26 (1991).

Moreland and Wickman, however, also raise a jail time credit issue. These two cases shall be argued before the court en banc on January 6, 1992, at 9:00 a.m. in St. Louis, Missouri. The parties' arguments shall be limited to the issue of jail time credit.


Summaries of

United States v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 2, 1991
951 F.2d 166 (8th Cir. 1991)
Case details for

United States v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. TITUS T. MOORE, APPELLANT. UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Dec 2, 1991

Citations

951 F.2d 166 (8th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

United States v. Goetz

Likewise, those circuits that previously granted credit for time served continue to do so under the new…

Moreland v. U.S.

A divided panel of this court reversed and remanded with instructions to credit Moreland for time spent at…