From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mofrad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
CR MJ 12-71277 MAG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

CR MJ 12-71277 MAG

03-14-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BEHZAD TALAI MOFRAD, Defendant.

STEVEN G. KALAR Federal Public Defender ELLEN V. LEONIDA Assistant Federal Public Defender Counsel for Defendant BEHZAD TALAI MOFRAD RODNEY C. VILLAZOR Assistant United States Attorney ELLEN V. LEONIDA Attorney for Benzai Talai Mofrad


STEVEN G. KALAR
Federal Public Defender
ELLEN V. LEONIDA
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Counsel for Defendant
BEHZAD TALAI MOFRAD

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO SET PRELIMINARY

HEARING OR ARRAIGNMENT ON

APRIL 10, 2013

The above-captioned matter was previously set on March 29, 2013 before Magistrate Kandis Westmore for a preliminary hearing or arraignment. The parties request that this Court set this matter for a preliminary hearing or arraignment on April 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., and that the Court exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act between March 29, 2013 and March 29, 2013. The parties stipulate that the time is excludable from the time limitations of the Speedy Trial Act because the interests of justice are served by granting a continuance, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

Such continuance is required because the government has produced discovery, and defense counsel needs time to review the discovery and, in addition, research legal and factual issues. This continuance will allow the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

As such, the parties respectfully request that the time between March 29, 2013 and April 10, 2013 be excluded under U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

_________________

RODNEY C. VILLAZOR

Assistant United States Attorney

_________________

ELLEN V. LEONIDA

Attorney for Benzai Talai Mofrad

ORDER

Based on the reason provided in the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby FINDS that for adequate preparation of the case by all parties, and in the interest of justice, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), an exclusion of time is warranted under the Speedy Trial Act. Based on these findings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the hearing is continued until April 10, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. before the Magistrate Court, and time is excluded until April 10, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

KANDIS WESTMORE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Mofrad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
CR MJ 12-71277 MAG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Mofrad

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BEHZAD TALAI MOFRAD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

CR MJ 12-71277 MAG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2013)