From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Miranda

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jan 6, 2016
627 F. App'x 578 (8th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-2354

01-06-2016

United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jarvis Miranda, also known as Crazy Defendant - Appellant


Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville [Unpublished] Before GRUENDER, BENTON and KELLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Jarvis Miranda directly appeals after he pled guilty to a drug-conspiracy offense and a felon-in-possession offense and the district court sentenced him to a total of 293 months in prison, upon imposing two partially consecutive prison terms. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence.

The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. --------

After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. David, 682 F.3d 1074, 1076-77 (8th Cir. 2012) (discussing appellate review of sentencing decisions); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3584 (if multiple terms of imprisonment are imposed at same time, terms may run concurrently or consecutively; as to each offense court shall consider 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors). Furthermore, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm.


Summaries of

United States v. Miranda

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Jan 6, 2016
627 F. App'x 578 (8th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Miranda

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jarvis Miranda, also…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jan 6, 2016

Citations

627 F. App'x 578 (8th Cir. 2016)