From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Milford

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 19, 2017
No. 16-1878 (4th Cir. Jan. 19, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-1878

01-19-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EUGENE MILFORD, Defendant - Appellant.

Eugene Milford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cv-02009-RMG) Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene Milford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eugene Milford appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the United States on its complaint and on Milford's counterclaims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Milford, No. 2:15-cv-02009-RMG (D.S.C. July 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Milford

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 19, 2017
No. 16-1878 (4th Cir. Jan. 19, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Milford

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. EUGENE MILFORD…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 19, 2017

Citations

No. 16-1878 (4th Cir. Jan. 19, 2017)