From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Meyer

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 15, 1968
403 F.2d 52 (9th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 22358A.

October 15, 1968.

Becker Moore, (for Meyer), West Covina, Cal., Stephen Adams (for Campbell), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Sidney I. Lezak, U.S. Atty., Charles H. Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Ore., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.


In this Dyer Act conviction we hold it was not error to permit one F.B.I. agent to sit at the government table during the trial although he was a witness. The instruction given on guilty knowledge was as good as the one submitted by the defendant, and it was adequate. The trial judge was a little impatient at one point, but the jury was adequately instructed on the point.

Other objections here were not properly made or preserved in the trial court, but we find them without merit.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Meyer

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 15, 1968
403 F.2d 52 (9th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

United States v. Meyer

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Ronald Lee MEYER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 15, 1968

Citations

403 F.2d 52 (9th Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Thomas

Under the law of this circuit, Agent Smith was properly excluded from this rule as an officer for the…

United States v. Mannino

United States v. Valencia-Riascos, 696 F.3d 938, 941 (9th Cir. 2012). See, e.g., id.; United States v.…